EEAC Steering Committee Meeting Minutes
January 19, 2022
Wednesday 5:30pm – 7pm
Online Zoom Meeting
Attending:
Robert Wallace, E. Shig Matsukawa, Mike Zamm, Mary Leou, Bonnie Ralston, Fran Agnone, Isa Del Bello, Ilana Weinstein, Robin Sanchez, Bethany Kogut, Many Most, Amanda Levy, Ray Pultinas, Andy Stone
Quorum for Steering Committee (SC) is majority of SC members. Total SC members: 14. Majority: 8.
2022 SC meetings: 1/19, 2/16, 3/16, 4/20, 5/18, 6/15, 7/20, 8/17, 9/21, 10/19, Nov. Annual Mtg, 12/21.
The following bullet notes for review and approval by the steering committee on 1/19/2022:
Meeting Minutes/ Agendas
Minutes were approved — Isa and Ray explained process of approving minutes for new SC members.
Fran: Today is a bit of a learning meeting for new members, we will explain each item as we go along.
Mary: slate has been voted on and approved unanimously. Welcome 4 new members, Robyn Ilana, Amanda, Bethany. We are honored to have our 4 new members!
Everyone did brief introductions of themselves (new and existing SC members).
This is something we will cover in our retreats — new members should review at some point.
Looking at 2 retreats — ideally in person. Given Omicron etc. we will be meeting virtually, at least for the first one. Bonnie will send info to new members and a doodle poll.
Part 1: “Who is in the room?” — this is an opportunity to learn about new members and existing members can re-introduce themselves. We will discuss what it means to be a SC member.
Part 2: SC 101 — There will be questions in advance and some documents to look at before the meeting.
Thank you Mary M for your service! Such a valued member of the SC and you will be missed!
Mary will send final 2021 report via email to whole steering committee in the coming month—Final report linked above.
Mary put membership stats in the agenda:

Mary L. gave a brief background for new SC members: NYSOEA got involved with us when we were working on an environmental literacy plan ~10 years ago. There was a natural opportunity for EEAC to partner/connect/collaborate with a group that works on a state-wide basis. Like us they have an annual conference and are membership driven. We also have joint membership with NYSOEA (2 for 1). Idea that there is power in numbers. We are always open to more opportunities to partner further.
Mike also gave some background: After the effort to infuse EE concepts into the New York State Syllabus and Curriculum, which NYSOEA helped with was successfully completed there was a time that some NYSOEA members developed an anti-urban bias which was reflected at one of their conferences. However by the end of the 1990’s EEAC and NYSOEA were working together again. When we started TEEP they were in support of that. They published the TEEP whitepaper in their newsletter.
Programming committee will have their first meeting time set by next month’s SC meeting.
Mike gave background for new SC members: EEPF grew out of TEEP. It was an initiative to get colleges to adopt EE in their programs. The forum grew as a yearly workshop at Teachers College and then moved to NYU. It evolved into EEPF. The main piece of TEEP is the syllabi bank. EEPF is an annual project forum where environmental educators get together to exchange ideas. The biggest challenge is to put projects that arise from EEPF into action — this is the biggest focus for next steps. The next piece of EEPF is training for teachers (10 courses on syllabi bank). We have seen lots of traffic on the syllabi bank.18 months — over 1100 downloads.
We also became involved in a campaign to add “the Right to Learn How Nature Works” to formal documents in New York State. Through that effort EEAC became involved in the campaign to include an environmental. rights amendment in the NYS Constitution. This was approved by the voters this past November but it did not include a mention of environmental education or nature education. The next step is to get something specifically about environmental education in a formal State and/or City Proclamation.
Another project is to get a weather station in every school to study climate change. Covid put a big pause on this. It’s beginning to gain momentum again. The High School of environmental studies is interested in getting a station. Robyn has sent a list of 32 schools that may be a good fit. We are holding off on further recruitment until omicron has let up.
Amanda suggested NYCHA
Shig suggested LUNGS
Update for Governors Island Center for Climate Solutions: 12 applicants reduced to 4 – competitors are MIT, Columbia (one other not mentioned) and City College. Our bid for support was for City College, which is one of the 4 finalists.
Bonnie R. Reached out to a colleague from the New School as a potential fit for a student project but the timeline/program in question doesn’t work — the program is too short. However her colleague suggested working through a professional design group where they would work on the typography, color palette, skins for the website, printed material and other ephemera. This would amount to 3 months of work and be 10K. This gives us a ballpark as an Initial starting point. In soliciting design work we would need to do some kind of compensation: you get what you pay for. What would be the bare minimum? 10K is beyond our operating budget — what are the things we should prioritize? Identity, typography, skins for website.
Robyn suggested Bellweather, DDC’s town and gown program, FIT students. Bonnie asked if there is compensation for students? No compensation from the agency but students put this work in their portfolio. It is a prestigious program so students do their best work.
Mary L: Many students take on this type of work as their thesis. Students are often looking for real world projects because they serve as resume builders and a foot in the door. Mary and Bob will think of, and send along NYU contacts.
Fran: There is a parent from PS 110 who volunteered for graphic design work and is fantastic. Rran will reach out to them to get suggestions.
Next steps are to continue to research options and then regroup. If it is something fee or stipend based, the SC will need to agree what is an acceptable amount to pay.
Fran will take a stab using paypal to set up EEAC zoom account. Use info@eeac gmail for account
Definition of a few different pages:
Local Links– A list of environmental organizations that service NYC schools. You don’t have to be a member to access. It’s the basis for links that we provided to schools for field trips, and was the base for DOE EE field trip list. EEAC provides this free resource to the public.
Database — Searchable list of local organizations, curricula, and services. Members can list their organizations/services. There is more information listed for the courses they offer for PD. The database came from TEEP because they found that there was no central place to find EE PD. This project has kind of stalled because organizations need to self-submit or approve that we list them. River did a lot of research for organizations that do PD and had done some outreach to gain permission to post on our website. We have 110 orgs in a spreadsheet and need to continue outreach so that we can get on the website.
Other resources page — This is a list of organizations beyond NYC. It is not yet live. Still undecided if we want to make this live in the near future. Amanda suggests we have other resources as a map rather than a list
EEAC Steering Committee Meeting Minutes
December 15, 2021
Wednesday 5:30pm – 7pm
Online Zoom Meeting
Attending:
Robert Wallace, E. Shig Matsukawa, Mike Zamm, Mary Leou, Bonnie Ralston, Sarah Pidgeon, Fran Agnone, Bonnie McGuire
Meeting Minutes/ Agendas
Sarah Mixing up order! Nominations first. Keep meeting to an hour. Mary L, Mary M and Bob met to make sure that nominees are in good standing. They ironed out some errors.
Bob presented slide show of officers, members and nominees. River is in position to be re-elected. Fran is Vice Chair, Isa is Secretary, Bonnie R is Membership Secretary/Treasurer. Nominated/Elected: Bethany Kogut, Amanda Levy, Robin Sanchez, Sunny Corrao, Luis Gonzalez, Robert Wallace, Raymond Pultinas.
*Luis Gonzalez nomination is undetermined — Mary L and/or Bob will follow up to clarify.
It was determined that term limits are January 2022-December 2024 (Term technically ends at end of 2024 but the hand-off includes January of 2025)
Next year (2023), Mary L, Shig, Bonnie R, Bonnie M, and Isa will be up for reelection.
It was determined that the number of SC members should be 15. With all nominees, the number of SC members would be 1 more. There was discussion of best solution for this — ideas included:
Questions came up about contested elections vs uncontested. Also stated that there will not be live a ballot this year because it’s too complicated via zoom.
Sarah will create a google form that will go to all members to vote. And make 1/19 deadline and announcement of new members. Quorum is 20 votes for membership.
There is conversation about the changing the by-laws — this is something to do in 2022.
Fran then transitioned to planning for next steps after the election.
Shig updates: Comms meeting was Bonnie R, Isa and Shig. We reviewed the membership packet. Will have it on the website as a landing page for new members and SC members.
Bonnie R. has reached out to an Assistant Professor at the New School. She will report back when she hears back.
Bonnie M. still looking for news blog content. She will likely highlight something that the Rangers are doing — New Year’s hikes and Kids Week.
Sarah: Thank you everyone for making the annual meeting happen. Excited to start brainstorming for next year. Begin setting regular programming meetings again for 2022.
Mike has tentative meeting with Robin S to discuss the weather station project and DEP’s involvement. HS of Environmental Studies is interested in getting a weather station — they have funding for it and Mike will continue to work with them to see if the project will materialize.
Sarah will create voting template. It will go out by the 5th. Agenda will be set to welcome new SC members at the top of the meeting on 1/19.
EEAC Steering Committee Meeting Minutes
October 20, 2021
Tuesday 5:30pm – 7pm
Online Zoom Meeting
Attending:
Steering Committee Members (8): Fran Agnon, Sarah Pidgeon, Mike Zamm, Shig Matsukawa, Bonnie McGuire, Ray Pultinas, Mary Leou, Bonnie Ralston.
Other EEAC Members (2): Ilana Weinstein (City Parks Foundation; formerly Urban Park Ranger Bronx), Andrew Stone.
Committee Reports and Updates
Hearing from a school that values EE has been impacted in keeping programs on the table this fall.
Discussed Annual Meeting, Nov 17 Wed 5:30 – 7 pm
Shift to State of the Field Update
Looking for help
For newsblog (Bonnie M.): need submissions, such as, book reviews; Environmental Rights Amendment from Mike Z.
Website update (Shig M.):
Discussed NYSOEA
Updates by Mike Z.:
Noted: Sam Holmes passed away, age 96, a founder of EEAC, Mke suggests someone else to write about Sam Holmes.
Environmental Rights Amendment to be on the ballot as question 2; New York State would be the 7th state to have it; about 80% in favor, but need people to vote; there’s really no opposition; Environmental Rights Fact Sheet by Environmental Advocates NY: https://eany.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/Enviro-Rights-Fact-Sheet.pdf
Updates by Bonnie R.:
Updates: will create invoices; Eventbrite for Annual Meeting – create “2022 Membership Drive”; Eventbrite list should be moved to another committee?
TO DO:
EEAC Steering Committee Meeting Minutes
September 21, 2021
Tuesday 5:30pm – 7pm
Online Zoom Meeting
Attending:
River DiLeo, Robert Wallace, E. Shig Matsukawa, Joy Garland, Mike Zamm, Mary Leou, Bonnie Ralston, Sarah Pidgeon, Mary Most, Isa Del Bello, Fran Agnone, Bonnie McGuire, Andrew Stone, Christina Tobitch
Committee Reports and Updates
Shig: newsletter will be available on website
Mike stated that he would like to start working with the NY State Senator in his area to get a constitutional amendment measure to be passed (advocacy for clean water, air, environment etc.) SC is in support so he will pursue next steps and update the group as needed.
In addition, Mike has been contacted by CUNY professors who have asked for support for Governors Island Climate Consortium. Pose question to the group: Should we partner or should we pass this opportunity on to our members and their organizations? Mike offered to act as conduit and will send out the letter for review by SC and then follow-up after the letter is reviewed.
Bonnie: R requested that SC members review membership documents over next 2 weeks. Once feedback is provided these docs will be turned into a membership packet. In addition, Bonnie R is working on the SC welcome packet which outlines roles/responsibilities/expectations. Is asking for SC to review and contribute to this document as well.
20 Individual Members, 1 student, 35 Indiv thru 7 orgs, 32 LIfetime
(vs 2019 = 42 Indiv, 12 Student, 79 Indiv thru 29 Org, 30 Lifetime)
TO DO:
Many changes to steering committee:
Given these changes, the nomination committee suggested that we potentially postpone the election given that we need to fill some vacancies and want to recruit more. SC was in agreement that because we have so much moving around with SC committee chairs its best to postpone to January. Mary M asked how a delay in elections would affect folks who are stepping down. River stated that the timeline for the election andf new people stepping in won’t affect a person ending their role. The beginning and ending of roles are at the end of January. So new SC members will be elected before the switch (we don’t need to delay when a person begins or ends their role in accordance with the election). River then stated that it is ideal to have a person in acting position and another ‘in training’ if the timing works out.
The nomination committee then discussed changes in term limits. New term limits go into effect after the next election. The point of term limits is to motivate SC to actively recruit because of a higher rate of turn over.
Nominations:
EEAC Steering Committee Meeting Minutes
November 17, 2021
Wed 5:30 pm – 7 pm
Online Zoom Meeting
Attending:
Shig Matsukawa, Bonnie Ralston, Bonnie McGuire, Fran Agnone, Mary Leou, Mary Most, Mike Zamm, Andrew Stone, Ray Pultinas, Robert Wallace, Isa Del Bello
Visiting: Ilana Weinstien
Committee Reports and Updates
EEACminutes20210921 and EEACminutes20211020 (in process!)
Planning Annual Meeting Document: Year-47-2021_EEAC-Annual-Meeting_Faciltators-Guide-20211208.pdf
General Annual meeting logistics
Panel Discussion:
Slideshow updates
Networking and member feedback
Additional thoughts
Fran will walk Sarah through tracking the number of attendees through her zoom account.
Bonnie R. will join the communications committee at their next meeting (Dec. 1, 2021) to finalize membership benefits to be posted on the website. There may be time to discuss potential transition to an integrated membership system embedded in the website. Regarding a marketing plan, Bonnie M. will share planning document with Isa so that she can begin working on next steps for this project.
Mike raised a question as to why we have less submissions in the professional learning database that anticipated. The response was that the first strategy was to build a database and “people will come” — this did not happen. They then decided to take a different approach by EEAC preliminarily posting materials and then reaching out to respective orgs for approval to put on the website. This was also tabled due to bandwidth. We have since decided to use the annual meeting as a push for folks to submit on their own. We will assess further need for outreach in the new year. If outreach is needed, Mike has draft press release but we will hold off until database is more robust.
Bonnie M is looking for any EE related topic to go on newsblog — she has continued outreach for submissions to no avail. She clarified that blogs can be shorter than the size of articles that went into the newsletter — it can be a paragraph as part of anthology (book reviews) or content that is just a few paragraphs. Essentially, submissions can be varied in length and all are useful. In gathering ideas for the newsblog, Mary L. has student reviews of braiding sweetgrass. She will also think of collaboration for students in future. Ilana is interested in writing nature highlights to contribute — she has a whole bunch of stuff to share. Other ideas include member highlights as well as using social media to boost outreach.
Mike thanked everyone for their support of the environmental rights amendment effort; there were 2m votes. For TEEP database there have been 900 downloads. Unexpectedly, there hasn’t been much participation from NYS colleges although parks and community associations in the state have downloaded syllabi. Mike will reach out to Eban Goodstein to see if he will submit a course. Mike next wants to start an effort “right to learn of how nature works,” and idea that came from forum last year. Mike also mentioned the weather stations that City College is distributing. It’s 5k to put a weather station in a school. Mike will provide a list of all schools that are currently participating. No updates for the climate solutions center on GI — it was a highly competitive bid.
Bonnie R. reported that member engagement work is the biggest item in next steps. This year we had virtual semi-retreat. In the coming year, Bonnie would like to have a larger scale retreat once we have new SC members. Everything else in progress.
TO DO: zoom
Mary has no additional updates since the PDF she shared last month. She is Looking forward to getting new members through on Eventbrite. She suggested that we get an EEAC annual zoom account as it is only $150 and we have regular use for it. There is also the issue of switching names on the banking account. That is still in process. There was also the suggestion that we move away from Gmail as a main email account, although it was mentioned that google drive is very useful for shared working documents. We will continue to think of ways to organize our existing accounts. We will assign the task of setting up an EEAC Zoom account at the next SC meeting.
EEAC Meeting July 21, 2021 Wed 5:30 pm – 7 pm Online Zoom Meeting
Committee Reports and Updates
Discussion over whether to hold Same or different event? Brainstorming will take place between now and next steering committee meeting. Program Committee will send invite to list serve to get fresh inputs. Step one will be finding the date.
Mask wearing is discussed – different rules now – norms are variable
Share out in person – details will come – EEAC 2 days virtual and 1 day of regional meet ups.
Here is a mini-report related to the EEPF projects.
Thanks to Shig for continuing to upgrade the numbers.
There has also been a response to the outreach Mike has been conducting. Since Mike renewed and expanded the distribution of our syllabi bank statement to colleges of education in mid-April there has been an increase in downloads, from 41 in April 2021 to 233 in May and June. There have been increases in demand for all ten courses in the bank. Mike has now sent outreach to over 60 colleges of education. There are 131 in New York State.
We still don’t know for sure which schools and educators are downloading and how the syllabi will be used. No college has contributed any courses to the syllabi bank since Cornell became the fourth school to do so in mid-May.
The status of the proclamation on the “right to learn how nature works”, hasn’t changed. State Senator Jackson’s office still hasn’t responded as to whether the Senator will move forward with it. Mike is going to sit on it for awhile since he thinks it is better to have the proclamation announced in the context of the election campaign in the Fall when the amendment to the constitution calling for all New Yorkers to have clean air, clean water and a healthy environment (not exact wording)comes before the voters.
Also, suggestion made that we may want to consider asking Eric Adams to issue a mayoral proclamation if he is elected (which I assume he will be but I take nothing for granted these days). Adams and his staff have shown some interest in sustainability and environmental education in the past when they suggested that all sustainability coordinators in the public schools should be given one paid period a day to do their work- as you know the position is currently all volunteer. His staff was responsive when we approached them about expanding the number of paid periods for the coordinators beyond one period although we were not able to get that done.
We should also think about whether we want to approach Adams about increasing overall support for EE beyond the proclamation. Some EEAC members have worked with his staff in his role as borough president.
Note: The last time Mike looked a third organization had submitted information to the EE database. If we can get it up to ten, as we said at the last meeting, we can send out the public outreach notice. River it working on this- Mike offered to help make some calls and/or send emails to some groups to elicit their participation.
Trying to figure out a steering committee retreat – making some big decisions in the fall, some amount of time virtually and then a time for in person meeting. Member engagement – really pulling them into our learning process.
The earlier and most advanced notification will be best for this – This is a priority for the Bonnies.
A date, sooner than later.
TO DO:
For readability or to print, Enter Reader View or Show Reader.
EEAC Meeting June 16, 2021 Wed 5:30 pm – 7 pm Online Zoom Meeting
Committee Reports and Updates
Feedback: Fran, Mary, River – Virtual Workshops – in total around 10 teachers – one critique was that there was not a set time for participants to explore Expo booth – Mary’s solution was sending her avatar to other booths to gather as many participants to ours as possible. Welcome to the virtual era of Expos and Conferences. It was generally agreed that virtual reality still needs improvement, and we questioned whether it will be worth it the next time. We’re looking forward to when in person events return. The technology faltered, but after the tech was sorted out – it seemed to be overall worth it – Fran’s slide show was great
Great speakers from RISE (Resiliency Innovations for a Stronger Economy) + HS for Climate Justice – good symmetry between the two groups. Even though not so well attended (about 16 attendees including 5 steering committee members + 4 presenters). The recording is worth it. A “natural conversation” among presenters took place and it didn’t feel forced – will be visible on line by next week.
Rebranding/Logo Redesign: Still in a loop with Sarah but question arose whether we are placing all our eggs in one basket. Suggestions made that there may be EEAC Members who could help. River suggested reaching out to Sarah one more time and then going to membership – Alternatively, we also might consider something we spend money on.
Committee urged to review member engagement strategies
Bonnie M. Shared Website and Newsletter Survey results.
Communications meeting scheduled for Monday, June 28 – to discuss Newsletter/blog/flow
TBD New Member Packet, Marketing Plan
Database Updates
The internal section:
SC members still to be given access?
Instructions to using WordPress (WP):
How-to screen recording (video) #1 – Login Steps:
https://eeac-nyc.org/202002-wp/login-steps/
Next videos will include, navigating in WP, and using Dashboard. Or, set zoom appointment for a hands-on guide.
Website plan – upcoming:
Redesign of the website based on the Adaptive Plan – will follow the rebranding/logo redesign phase.
Membership system – will be tested in our permanent testing site which is now at testsite.eeac-nyc.org.
Mary M. raised the question of there now being several lists being used and the recurring need to be updated – can some be automatic? Features are available to facilitate management of several lists.
Decision: this will be tabled until future Communications meeting
PUBLICIZING WEBSITE? Suggestions Professional Development tools for Teachers, STEM/ Discovery Team/ Rebranding or Retweeking/- regardless a Professional Learning Resources Focus. There is a Gap – we know who we are but need resources – can also share info about curricular resources and field trips – open to discussion
Issuing PRESS RELEASE?
Press release is ready to go – once we get 25 entries – Mike suggested that 10 entries might be fine.
Reaching out to DOE STEM – who is best person? Sasha
Follow up on 2 requests via the website’s contact form, to subscribe to the listserv.
Shig continues to experiment with Newsletter-blog using WordPress.
Updates from Cristina:
NYSOEA Registration and raffle tickets coming soon
Proceeds from raffle goes towards camper scholarship (one person) and EAI events
Equitable funding – working on putting up on Committee page
Reclaiming YOUTUBE page for others to share
2021 Conference will be a hybrid virtual/in-person (November). Registration not yet open. Hop in virtual/live in person hybrid
Metro Region host: Jones Beach State Park
Still looking for proposals – for in person days – skill shares 15 minute shares. Opportunity also for 60 minute workshops – but largely looking for the brief presentations/ less of an ask/ less in terms of prep.
Cristina would really like the City EEAC members to be more involved and engaged, not many last year at the totally virtual conference.
Still looking for carpool coordination
Mike will keep us up to date on Environmental Amendment to NYS Constitution (In order for us to learn more in detail about this I have reprinted here an article from New York Law Journal dated June 21, 2021 by Karen Meara and Christopher Rizzo). Mike is in continued correspondence with State Senator Robert Jackson. If we get behind it – increase the hype etc., it could be adopted – and it would be a significant thing to do.
This November New York state voters will be asked to decide whether to amend the New York State Constitution to create an individual right to clean air, clean water and a healthy environment. The proposed environmental rights amendment (the Amendment) would add a new §19 to Article 1—the section titled “bill of rights.” If history is any guide, voters are likely to approve it. New York voters have approved 19 of the 25 ballot amendments referred by the legislature since 1995. While the clear intent is to increase protections for individual New Yorkers from environmental hazards ranging from tainted drinking water to asthma-inducing air pollution, the Amendment is vaguely worded—the entire text reads “Each person shall have a right to clean air and water and a healthful environment”—and thus its full implications are unclear and subject to judicial interpretation. This article considers what the Amendment might mean for New Yorkers, lawyers and courts.
Amendment Process
Proposed amendments to the Constitution may only be sent to the voters for a referendum if they are approved by both houses of the New York state legislature in two consecutive legislative sessions. See NYS Const. Art. XIX §1. The Amendment was first introduced during the 2017-2018 legislative session and passed by the Assembly, but never made it out of committee in the Senate. It was reintroduced in the 2019-2020 legislative session and approved by both houses. Finally, as required under Article XIX, it was sent again to the legislature after the 2020 elections and approved by lopsided votes of both houses early in the 2021-2022 legislative session.
A Constitutional Right to a Clean Environment?
Environmental protection is a concept utterly lacking in the U.S. Constitution, although it is included in the constitutions of many other nations. In contrast, New York’s constitution directly addresses environmental issues. It includes provisions requiring the conservation of certain public lands and requiring the legislature to “protect and conserve natural resources.” Article XIV, §4 specifically requires the legislature to “include adequate provision for the abatement of air and water pollution and of excessive and unnecessary noise, the protection of agricultural lands, wetlands and shorelines, and the development and regulation of water resources,” and §5 allows any citizen to bring suit to enforce violations of §4. However, the few New York courts that have interpreted these provisions have held that, while they impose an affirmative duty on the legislature and state agencies to act on conservation matters, those state actors retain substantial discretion in how to do so. In other words, New Yorkers do not, presently, have an affirmative right to a clean environment—at least according to courts.
So why now? As previously pointed out (https://www.law.com/newyorklawjournal/2021/03/15/why-do-we- need-the-green-amendment/) in these pages by Prof. Katrina Fischer Kuh, it may have a lot to do with the appalling tainted drinking water case from Hoosick Falls, N.Y. There, a resident concerned about high rates of cancer in the community six years ago tested the drinking water and found high levels of perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA). Because the contaminant was not then regulated by federal or state drinking water regulations, residents had little recourse other than begging the legislature and government agencies to take action. Increasing awareness of environmental justice issues and income-based disparities in water quality, air quality and respiratory health also serve as a motivating factor—the “justification” in the Senate’s 2021 memo in support cited both “recent water contamination and ongoing concerns about air quality” as a basis for establishing a “fundamental right.”
Experience From Other States
Federal courts have uniformly held that the U.S. Constitution contains no affirmative environmental rights. States courts have reached differing results, holding in a few instances that state constitutions do implicitly provide affirmative rights to a clean environment. The authors’ survey of state court litigation indicates over 100 court decisions addressing explicit and implicit environmental rights in state constitutions. The decisions have varied wildly and not always in the way red state/blue state politics might indicate. For example, California has no express environmental protections in its constitution and courts have held that the document contains no implicit environmental right either. Alabama courts reached a different conclusion and have held that its state constitution does contain implicit environmental rights. Most of the litigation comes from the few states with explicit environmental rights in their state or territorial constitutions—including Hawaii, Illinois, Massachusetts, Montana, the Northern Mariana Islands, Pennsylvania and Rhode Island. Of those, courts have been most likely to enforce the environmental rights in Hawaii, Pennsylvania and Montana.
The presence of explicit environmental rights has proven to be very meaningful in those three states. The most instructive example is from Pennsylvania. Its Environmental Rights Amendment to the state constitution states: “The people have a right to clean air, pure water and to the preservation of the natural, scenic, historic and esthetic values of the environment. Pennsylvania’s public natural resources are the common property of all the people, including generations to come. As trustee of these resources, the Commonwealth shall conserve and maintain them for the benefit of all people.” In 2012, as interest in Pennsylvania’s considerable Marcellus Shale gas reserves exploded, the State passed “Act 13”, which in part banned local regulation of fracking, including through zoning. One provision declared that such activities must be permitted as-of-right in all zoning districts. Citizens and certain towns sued the state, claiming in part that the law violated the Environmental Rights Amendment. The state’s top court agreed. It held that the state could not, in the name of advancing a certain industry, both usurp municipal authority to regulate that industry consistent with the Environmental Rights amendment and ignore its own affirmative obligations to comply with that amendment. It also held that citizens could litigate to enforce the rights guaranteed under Pennsylvania’s Environmental Rights Amendment. Robinson Twp. v. Commonwealth, 83 A.D.3d 901 (Sup. Ct. Pa. 2013); see also Montana Environmental Information Center v. Mt. Department of Environmental Quality, 296 Mont. 207 (Sup. Ct. Mt. 1999) (statute authorizing environmental agency’s issuance of a mineral exploration permit allowing discharges of pollutants to nearby waters without non-degradation review violated state’s environmental amendment).
Colorado’s top court reached the completely opposite result in 2016, in part because the state constitution contains no affirmative environmental rights or environmental amendments. The City of Longmont banned fracking and disposal of fracking wastes. The state’s oil and gas trade group sought a declaratory judgment that state law preempted local regulation of oil and gas drilling. The court agreed, stating: “[t]he Colorado Constitution does not include a similar provision [to Pennsylvania], and the citizen intervenors have not cited, nor have we seen, any applicable Colorado case law adopting the public trust doctrine in this state. We therefore conclude that the inalienable rights provision of the Colorado Constitution [reserving unnamed rights to citizens] does not save” the local law. City of Longmont v. Colorado Oil & Gas Ass’n, 2016 Co. 29, 62 (Sup. Ct. Colorado 2016).
What Is the Amendment Likely To Mean for New Yorkers?
In the best-case scenario, the amendment will push the legislature to do more to ensure that all New Yorkers are protected from environmental harms (and give citizens an enforceable right if the state fails to act.) The vagueness of the provision, however, means courts will have a lot of interpreting to do and that may produce some unintended consequences. There is a very real possibility that municipalities will invoke the constitutional right to a “healthful environment” to restrict some of the most controversial land-use initiatives in the state—affordable housing, high-density development, wind and solar facilities, electric transmission lines, etc. However, if government proponents of these initiatives include vigorous environmental protections and public review procedures, they will probably avoid the overreach that doomed the Pennsylvania fracking legislation in Robinson Township. We will see if courts agrees.
Karen Meara and Christopher Rizzo are attorneys in the environmental and land use group of Carter Ledyard & Milburn
Next Steps-
DISTRIBUTION OF MINI-REPORT TO ALL LISTS TO INFORM THEM ABOUT THE FORUM V REPORT ON THE WEBSITE!!
REPORT ON SYLLABI BANK and FOLLOWUP ON PROJECT IDEAS FROM FORUM V
July 2020 – today 627 views 373 downloads – that seems great – redoubled efforts
83 downloads in month of May responding to the notice – We don’t know who is downloading or how it’s being used.
NYU Bank Street
In June 18 views of page but 37 downloads
Memorial for Terry Ippolito is now up on the website for people to look at
Bonnie had to hop off Sent out a doodle poll for next AP check in – date does not seem to be set – next week sometime
Bylaws in a separate page as a draft with proposed changes/notes: https://eeac-nyc.org/202002-wp/internal-bylaws-draft/
Mary Most: We approved a zoom account but not yet bought one. Someone needs to coordinate it also, but if we don’t need it we don’t need it. Decision needs to be reached.
Membership: NO CHANGE from 5/19/2021 stats:
About 50% of members have renewed for 2021; only 24% of our Organizational memberships have renewed.
20 Individual Members, 1 student, 35 Indiv thru 7 orgs, 32 LIfetime
(vs 2019 = 42 Indiv, 12 Student, 79 Indiv thru 29 Org, 30 Lifetime)
1 new organization since March: Rocking the Boat
Note: we keep “expired” members on the roster for a year or two
EEAC Finances as of May 31, 2021
Report:
Bank acct: $8,163.57
Paypal balance: $513.67
Eventbrite balance: $135.00
Current Balance: $8,812.24
Tasks:
COMPLETED
TO DO:
Mary emphasized that eventbrite list maintenance should move to Programs or Communications Committees
Respectfully submitted,
Ray Pultinas
EEAC Secretary
EEAC Meeting May 19, 2021 Wed 5:30 pm – 7 pm Online Zoom Meeting
Committee Reports and Updates
Proposal for an event addressing lack of diversity and salary in the field of Environmental Education, so low compared to other educational professions. This event would not be just another skill share, but a genuine “special event.” To be held in the Fall of 2021.
In the meantime, we don’t want to stop skillshares
Skill shares have helped us establish partnerships between community based, schools, professional organizations
Expand PD – Stem focused – important last summers massive coalition to provide programming when SYEP funding was cut – how did they do that?
One Billion Oyster Project? – Example of a great partnership or collaboration through the lens of skill share – how they figured out how to work, fund raising, etc.
June Skill Share date June 15
Looking for partnership ideas University AND AN organization – still flexible – most important is successful – High School for Climate Justice – WE ACT
Follow up with Taylor – great if a teacher could present
Topic short list (from Stakeholder interviews during Strategic Planning)
Building partnerships to run EE programs ++++
How to write job descriptions and make low wage jobs learning and growing tools for employees
Advocacy angle: NAAEE working on this – Brock Adler
Building mentorship opportunities for EE professionals ++++
Confronting Lack of diversity in the field and low wages ++++
Mary J Leou to Everyone : I will send you some ideas Sarah …we have had along standing partnership with NYC Audubon
Bonnie Ralston (she/her) to Everyone : My school (Life Sciences Secondary School) is officially becoming the High School for Climate Justice, starting July 1st. We’re located on 96th St. between 1st and 2nd Ave.
Does this sound right?: Poll membership + Eventbrite registrants of last skill share to select next topic> google form?
Let’s keep the momentum going, Yamina would like to help
DOE Virtual STEM Expo Tuesday June 8; through Thursday, June 10 from 2:00pm-5:00pm – deadline Friday, 4/23
STEM Expo: We will host a virtual STEM Partner Expo on June 9th & 10th. The virtual platform offers the opportunity for your organization to have a booth in an expo hall. Each booth can accommodate up to two representatives from your organization. In the application, we ask what materials you will have at your booth (e.g. brochures, video, slide presentation, giveaways, raffle).
River/Bonnie R. can support tabling if it doesn’t conflict with presenting
Potential members: Jody, Karla (Fran will reach out Karla)
Reference EEAC Rebranding/Logo Redesign
No SVA student yet but a big group of summer students may prove successful – with Sarah’s husband
No meeting/no updates; Bonnie Mcguire did ask us to talk about blog and website:
Review member engagement strategies:
New Member Packet
Marketing Plan
Shig – working on syllabi bank – will be able to find out who is downloading – statistics shows that some indexing for search engine – we don’t know how many – but still not clear now who is
Updated # of hits – two tabs 2020 tab has data from last year
Looking at new Blog design
Mike noted the opportunity to really expand dramatically – given our way of capturing data and an opportunity to push our EEAC Identity agenda –
The snag of formatting the PDF is eliminated here and this is more accessible.
Awaiting next communications meeting to finalize and assign roles. River will send a link – with updates
The internal section:
SC members still to be given access?
Instructions to using WordPress (WP): How-to screen recording (video) #1 – Login Steps
Next videos will include, navigating in WP, and using Dashboard. Or, set zoom appointment for a hands-on guide.
Website plan – upcoming:
Redesign of the website based on the Adaptive Plan – will follow the rebranding/logo redesign phase.
Membership system – will be tested in our permanent testing site which is now at testsite.eeac-nyc.org.
PUBLICIZING WEBSITE?
Database content status report. MAILING OF PRESS RELEASE?
Followup on 2 requests via the website’s contact form, to subscribe to the listserv.
Attempt/experimenting Newsletter-blog using WordPress.
NYSOEA raised a little over $1,000 at our virtual fundraiser! Money is split between camp scholarships and future EAI events and trainings. Info shared on equitable funding will be put on the EAI Committee page. Looking to post old event recordings on youtube page.
2021 Conference, Riding the Wave of Change
November 4-6, 2021
It will be a hybrid of virtual/in-person.
Still accepting workshop proposals, especially for in-person day.
Metro Region host: Jones Beach State Park
Looking for those that can help with carpools
Human Right to understand how Nature works
Mike distinguished between Proclamation – holds no real legal power – we could issue Proclamation from individual person, like the Mayor or City Counsel Office –
A resolution, because it is voted on, would be better – In November, If approved, resolution it goes to state senate. Amendment to constitution – 7th state in the country to have something like this
The follow up would be that we need decent (better) environmental education if resolution is passed.
Next Steps- DISTRIBUTION OF MINI-REPORT TO ALL LISTS TO INFORM THEM ABOUT THE FORUM V REPORT ON THE WEBSITE!!
Outreached to 23 colleges – changes made depending on pre existing programs
497 views 255 downloads indicates that the syllabi bank is getting attention.
Shig reiterated that we don’t know whether or how they are using it. But it is encouraging that we are getting responses. Hopefully this trend will continue 6.
Discussion on how to honor Terri Ippolito – EEAC – very active former chair – very active
one tree not a substantial honor – what might be? Parks Dept. has a memorial grove at Alley Pond Park – plaque shaped like a tree –
River agrees that a blog would be best way to promote a tribute –
Mike or Mary – were asked if they could pull together an article – Mary M was happy to help and also mentioned that agencies like EPA where she served benefited from Terri’s work. This will all take time, perhaps some more defined action by the Fall.
REPORT ON SYLLABI BANK and FOLLOWUP ON PROJECT IDEAS FROM FORUM V
Suggestion made that this could be a nation wide, not just statewide initiative and search
Related to forum the issue of developing an Environmental Passport to encourage visits to Environmental Ed spaces and/or community gardens.
There is an East village Community Garden passport – used to be a stamp hanging or in a box nearby – a project put together by Museum of Reclaimed Urban Space – Perhaps now a QR code can be used to issue the “stamp” or provide a means of recording a visit. Thanks River for following up.
Bonnie R _ Update on votes for term limits 10 yes, 2 non responses.
Quorum? 1-6 strategic priorities
Last time met in March – makes sense for this group to reconvene to progress on points and revisions – in person meeting – DOE, PARKS, ETC. Smaller group – adaptive plan
10 present – ⅔ for amendment to pass – yes, passed
There has been no contact with Joy – Sarah will reach out – does she want to step down?
Review and approve “New Initiative Considerations” document
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1OyLnS1mDpt72f-oNu0-QPSPjbVdsDt_bDY_SZGyadZk/edit?usp=sharing
Next Steps
COOP (Bonnie M.)
Term limits and Steering Committee Service Roadmap (Thank you Mary Most for this idea!): https://docs.google.com/document/d/18nOQXzy69Zt_7rOXDZq3QneBft95FAZVGvVE_H7k8Yo/edit?usp=sharing
(c) Steering Committee members shall hold office for three (3) year terms; provided, however, that any Steering Committee member elected to fill an unexpired term (whether resulting from the death, resignation or removal of Steering Committee members) shall hold office until the next annual meeting at which the election of Steering Committee members is in the regular order of business and until a successor is elected or appointed and qualified. Steering Committee members may be elected to no more than two (2) consecutive terms (six years). A Steering Committee member can, pending nomination, return to the Steering Committee after a one term (3 year) hiatus.
Bylaws in a separate page as a draft with proposed changes/notes.
g. Membership and Finance:
Mary Most –
20 Individual Members, 1 student, 35 Indiv thru 7 orgs, 32 LIfetime
(vs 2019 = 42 Indiv, 12 Student, 79 Indiv thru 29 Org, 30 Lifetime)
1 new organization since March: Rocking the Boat
Note: we keep “expired” members on the roster for a year or two
Bank acct: $8,163.57
Paypal balance: $513.67
Eventbrite balance: $135.00
Current Balance: $8,812.24
3. Tasks:
COMPLETED
No membership drive but page is set up wants to just send out
TO DO:
Mary Most will contact the senders and make arrangements for replacement payment via PayPal or Eventbrite.
Respectfully submitted,
Ray Pultinas
EEAC Secretary